i've been meaning to get this straightened out. you had "qualms" with the other study? i didn't see where you wrote them out anywhere, unless it is implicit in reading the abstract for that article.
so...you're calling the earlier study not respectable? how come? i thought there style of measurement was interesting and informative. no? i do'nt know. maybe i'll go reread it.
i've been meaning to get this straightened out. you had "qualms" with the other study? i didn't see where you wrote them out anywhere, unless it is implicit in reading the abstract for that article.
ReplyDeleteso...you're calling the earlier study not respectable? how come? i thought there style of measurement was interesting and informative. no? i do'nt know. maybe i'll go reread it.
*their
ReplyDeleteagain, where do you take issue with the earlier study? unless this is a call for studies AGAIN the hypothesis that us media is sig. biased...dah ahdh.
*against
ReplyDeletenevermind. nevermind. nevermind.
ReplyDelete